Friday 21 March 2014

The next 'Wolverine' movie will arrive in ...


Hugh Jackman will star in a third standalone


Hugh Jackman will star in a third standalone "Wolverine" film scheduled for 2017 release.






  • Twentieth Century Fox has set release dates for "Fantastic Four II" and the next "Wolverine"

  • There's also a release date set for a mystery third Marvel film

  • The rebooted "Fantastic Four" will arrive in 2015, with the sequel set for 2017




(EW) -- It's never too early to make movie plans. Especially when you're a studio with a billion-dollar franchise at stake.


Twentieth Century Fox, which has only recently cast its new "Fantastic Four" and has another "X-Men" movie out this summer, has announced release dates for "Fantastic Four II," the next "Wolverine" standalone — and a mystery third Marvel film.


The rebooted "Fantastic Four," with Michael B. Jordan, Kate Mara, Jamie Bell, and Miles Teller reportedly aboard, is scheduled for June 19, 2015, but Fox has already penciled in a sequel for July 14, 2017.


Meanwhile, Hugh Jackman's "Wolverine," who stars in this May's "X-Men: Days of Future Past," will return in another standalone movie, targeted for March 3, 2017. His last solo effort, 2013′s "The Wolverine," grossed $414.8 million globally.


'Fantastic Four' casting: Fox zeroes in on its final 4


That film's director, James Mangold, is attached to the next sequel as well. (Another "X-Men" all-star movie, "X-Men: Apocalypse," will open May 27, 2016.)


Fox will deliver another Marvel film on July 13, 2018, but the studio hasn't yet announced which superhero will be suiting up. Since Fox owns only "X-Men" and "Fantastic Four," there's speculation that the film could be either a crossover or another standalone for a main character from one of those franchises.


In other Fox release-date news, Matthew Vaughn's "The Secret Service" has been bumped up from March 6, 2015 to October 24 of this year, swapping dates with an untitled Vince Vaughn movie.


'X-Men: Apocalypse': Bryan Singer teases new film 'will address mutant origins'


Daniel Radcliffe's "Frankenstein" is moving from January 16, 2015, to October 2, 2015. Liam Neeson's "Taken 3" will open January 9, 2016 -- right in the heart of Neeson Season! Fox is also counting on a still-unspecified Ridley Scott movie for a March 4, 2016 release date.


Studios like to stake out prime release-date real estate years in advance for their biggest blockbusters, to best protect their properties and theoretically maximize the industry's box-office by preventing costly head-to-head showdowns. It doesn't always work: "Captain America 3" is currently on a collision course with "Batman Vs. Superman" on May 6, 2016.


See the original story at EW.com.


CLICK HERE to Try 2 RISK FREE issues of Entertainment Weekly


© 2011 Entertainment Weekly and Time Inc. All rights reserved.



Don't blame my great-granddad, Putin





  • Putin says when Khrushchev handed Crimea to Ukraine, Russia was not "simply robbed, it was plundered"

  • Nina Khrushcheva says it's unfair to blame her great-grandfather for the act - Stalin was the real villain, she says

  • Further economic downturn is now inevitable, she says due to the economic sanctions imposed by the West




Editor's note: Nina Khrushcheva is professor of International Affairs at New School University in New York. Her latest book is "The Lost Khrushchev: A Journey into the Gulag of the Russian Mind." The views expressed in this commentary are entirely her own.


(CNN) -- It's official, Crimea is Russian. In the words of Vladimir Putin, "In people's hearts and minds, Crimea has always been an inseparable part of Russia." Indeed Russia said that in Sunday's referendum 97% of its participants, mostly ethnic Russians, insisted that to belong to the Great Russia versus Small Russia (Malorossiya, another name for Ukraine) had been their dream for 60 years since the Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev, my great-grandfather, transferred the peninsula's jurisdiction to Kiev.


In his address to Parliament on March 18 announcing the annexation, Putin said that by this Khrushchev action Russia was not "simply robbed, it was plundered." There are many reasons for transfer that Putin could have outlined: administrative, economic, desire to overcome Joseph Stalin's legacy of central control. Yet he chose to say my great-grandfather was atoning for "the mass repressions of the 1930s in Ukraine."



Nina Khrushcheva


Well, Khrushchev became the First Secretary of the Ukrainian Communist Party in 1938, when most of the repressions -- namely Holodomor, the Great Famine, brought in part by Stalin's heavy industrialization -- were over. It is rich of the Russian President to accuse Khrushchev of repressions. What about Stalin, the true tyrant? Putin is not Stalin, of course, not yet, but he sees himself walking in the dictator's shoes: he adds lands to the great Russia, while other sorry leaders like Khrushchev only squandered it away.


Not that Khrushchev, a Soviet autocrat, shied away from brutality, indeed participating in repressions and purges -- that was the style of the times. Nonetheless, after Stalin's death in 1953 his goal was to decentralize the Communist monolith, hence the Crimea transfer. No stranger to propaganda -- Communism excelled in arguing Soviet superiority over ethnic national pride, Ukrainian or any other, as well as over decadent and dying capitalism -- Khrushchev still would have cringed at Putin's distortions.


"Kiev is the mother of Russian cities. Ancient Rus is our common source and we cannot live without each other," the president said, implying that given this closeness Russia must have control over the Malorossian territory. Khrushchev too thought that Ukraine and Russia were almost one -- after all a symbolic reason for the 1954 transfer was the 300th anniversary of the Ukrainian-Russian unification. But he would think of them as equal nations, assigning the original primacy to the 9th century Kiev, not to Moscow, which until the 1100s was just an obscure place in the woods.





Crimea makes Putin more popular




Putin: Crimea part of Russia

Khrushchev, who valued diversity (as much as the Soviet despot could) would have condemned the Putin Doctrine -- development of the military industrial complex based on the Kremlin-centric heavy industry and export of raw materials. In Soviet times that complex was a staple of the economy, as the main slogan of the Kremlin was the class struggle against global imperialism. And even if my great-grandfather used that argument in Budapest, sending tanks to suppress the 1956 Hungarian Revolution, a popular uprising against hardline communism, he lamented similar tactics in 1968 when his successor Leonid Brezhnev squashed the Prague Spring.


Under Brezhnev this kind of incursions into neighboring territories became known as the Brezhnev Doctrine. It declared that forces hostile to socialism should not be tolerated, and to cement this argument in 1979 the USSR send troops to Afghanistan to provide security to its recently formed Democratic Republic. Khrushchev died in 1971 and didn't see what harm the Afghan war did to his country -- thousands of lives lost and the economy strained by the time it withdrew with defeat exactly a quarter of a century ago -- but he, who in retirement spoke candidly of his and Communism's mistakes, would have been horrified by the stanchness of the Kremlin's patterns.


Today Putin would undoubtedly suggest that Crimea is not different from Afghanistan. Speaking to the veterans about the Afghan invasion in February 2004, he explained there were legitimate geopolitical reasons to protect the Soviet Central Asian border. Now citing security of nations within Moscow's sphere of influence he has justified the Ukraine territorial takeover.


What's more, in the Brezhnev era the expansionist policies of the military industrial complex were a result of the oil prosperity. After the 1973 oil crisis its prices reached 41 dollars a barrel by 1981. They provided some material comforts to the Soviets, fueled their belief in the USSR's stability and strength. Similarly, with oil at around $100 a barrel in recent decades, the GDP growth under Putin -- up 8% until just a few years ago -- allowed Russians to live well like never before, also cultivating a sense of superiority. The success of the Sochi Olympics last month has only made it greater.


In fact the Crimeans' desire to join Russia is partially based on their trust that Putin will turn them into another Sochi, with posh hotels and pristine beaches. But the cost of upgrading or rebuilding the peninsula's economic and social infrastructure will range from $10 billion (300 billion rubles) to $85 billion (3 trillion rubles). Can Russia really foot that bill?


A bitter lesson from the Brezhnev USSR is that the state, driven by an undiversified and oil-based economy, runs out of funds to support its extra territories because nationalistic emotions take over economic calculations. Russian inflexible financial system was suffering even before the Ukrainian crisis began. Last year's forecasts suggest that in the next 15 years Russia's growth rate would fall from 4.3% to 2.5% if it keeps its raw material focus.


Now with the United States, Europe and Japan hitting the Kremlin with sanctions -- account freezes and visa bans for the high level Putin government officials -- further economic downturn is inevitable.


The Brezhnev Doctrine -- defense of socialism through expansion and the military industrial complex -- had led to the inglorious Soviet collapse. The doomsday of the Putin Doctrine must be approaching fast.


The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Nina Khrushcheva.



Kimye take Vogue: How you reacted


Kim Kardashian and Kanye West appear on the cover of Vogue magazine's April 2014 issue.


Kim Kardashian and Kanye West appear on the cover of Vogue magazine's April 2014 issue.






  • Kanye West and Kim Kardashian are on the cover of Vogue magazine's April issue

  • West had previously said he believed there was no reason Kardashian shouldn't be on the cover

  • The couple's daughter North was also present at the photo shoot

  • The issue arrives digitally March 24 and on newsstands March 31




(CNN) -- What Kanye West wants, he gets.


After all, he wanted Kim Kardashian for years, and is now set to marry her in May. (They already welcomed their first child together, North, last June.)


So should we be surprised that the rapper, who's previously campaigned for his bride-to-be to appear on the cover of Vogue magazine, can place a checkmark next to that goal?


It's true. Kardashian and West are appearing on the April issue of Vogue magazine. And this, soon after West proclaimed on Ryan Seacrest's radio show that it was preposterous it had not yet happened.


"There's no way Kim Kardashian shouldn't be on the cover of Vogue," West told Seacrest back in October. "She's like the most intriguing woman right now. ... and collectively, we're the most influential in clothing."


"No one is looking at what Obama is wearing. Michelle Obama can't Instagram a (bathing suit) pic like what my girl Instagrammed the other day."


The cover is vaguely reminiscent of Kardashian's other high-profile appearance on the front of People magazine in 2011, when she posed with her then-fiancé, basketball player Kris Humphries. Except this time, she's traded in the contemporary clothing for sumptuous luxury wares.




Kanye West poses with Kim Kardashian and daughter, North.

Kanye West poses with Kim Kardashian and daughter, North.



Calling Kardashian and West #theworldsmosttalkedaboutcouple, Vogue is promising a firsthand look inside the pair's "fashionable life and surreal times," including a glimpse of how they interact as parents. The pair's daughter, North, appears with them in a behind-the-scenes video of the Vogue photo shoot.


The unveiling of the issue, which arrives on newsstands March 31 and digitally March 24, was met with a mix of reactions, from stunned to supportive to upset.


"Somewhere, Victoria Beckham is flipping a table," joked one observer. "Vogue negotiates with terrorists," quipped another.


Vogue isn't a stranger to controversy -- earlier this year it was criticized by some for its treatment of "Girls" star Lena Dunham -- but the vitriol directed toward Vogue editor Anna Wintour regarding the April issue has been visceral.







"If someone could start a petition to have Anna Wintour fired over this, society would appreciate it," said @RunBritRun. "Anna Wintour RETIRE NOW. You're mentally unstable," chimed in @Jenovia.


"I just wonder what went through Anna Wintour's mind. Has she gone mad?" asked another onlooker.












Given the timing of the issue, a handful wondered if Vogue was pulling some sort of elaborate (not to mention expensive) April Fool's Day prank.







Fans of the couple were just as breathless as Kardashian tweeted she was when they spotted the pair's glossy cover shot.







"If you're actually mad at Kim and Kanye's Vogue cover," tweeted @Kia_Mak, "go outside, start walking and don't stop until you reach the horizon."


Added @PatrickSandberg, "Kim and Kanye refuse to accept the limitations people try to put on them and it's inspiring. They win."


Mostly, though, it looks some are just confused by the #worldsmosttalkedaboutcouple hashtag Vogue is trying to promote.







"Wait," said @NikiBlasina. "That doesn't look like Jay-Z and Beyonce."



Guardia Civil detain twenty in Nerja


The Guardia Civil have intercepted more than 1,500 kilos of hashish from a boat in the Cala de Maro.


A total of 20 people have been arrested so far in this anti-drug operation in Nerja including a National policeman and a Guardia Civil.


According to police sources the courts in Velez-Malaga have kept 15 of the accused on remand, all for crimes against public health.


As the case moves on they are also expected to be accused of money laundering, bribery, and belonging to an organised crime group.


Among the five let go pending a judicial hearing, were the two law enforcement officers.



Epic 2-letter win on 'Wheel of Fortune'





  • A contestant guess correctly with only two letters revealed

  • Pat Sajack said he was "rather stunned"

  • The win netted him $45,000




(CNN) -- Oh baby!


On "Wheel of Fortune" Wednesday, a contestant named Emil turned two letters into $45,000 during the bonus round. His luck (skill? clairvoyance?) shocked host Pat Sajak and thrilled the Internet.


After being given the letters "R, S, T, L, N, E" and selecting the letters "H, M, D, O," Emil had only "N" and "E" to work with on the final puzzle, a three-word phrase which was simply described as a "thing." Sajak advised him to just talk it out.


"You're a very good puzzle solver, but I don't know," Sajak said. "You have 10 seconds. Keep talking. Maybe the right thing will pop out. Good luck."


Emil nailed it on his first try: "New baby buggy."


His shock that he had guessed it caused Emil to utter, "Oh, my God," jump in the air and grab his heart. Sajak jokingly patted him down (perhaps for some sort of secret puzzle-solver device) and said, "I'm rather stunned!"


The host later tweeted "Tonight's 'Wheel of Fortune' features most amazing solve in my 30+ years on the show. No kidding." The video of the win has since gone viral.







Congrats Emil!


'Wheel of Fortune' pronunciation gaffe costs contestants, angers fans



Meningitis at Melilla Migrant Centre


The last few weeks has seen something of a crisis at migrant centres in Ceuta and Melilla, the Spanish exclaves in Morocco.


The Ceuta and Melilla borders into Spain have regularly been stormed by massive groups of immigrants looking for a way into Europe.


But now a new disaster has hit. A meningitis scare has hit the Melilla temporary detention centre (CETI), forcing health officials to launch a prevention and quarantine protocol for 226 people in total, both Sub-Saharans and facility personnel.


A case of meningitis has been recorded at the centre for temporary detention (CETI). Reports say that a 19-year-old Sub-Saharan at the centre was hospitalized in a critical condition for meningitis in the intensive care unit of the Melilla hospital.


A local government representative, Abdelmalik El Barkani, assured local media that it was "an isolated case" and that "to say that it is an epidemic would create alarm and would not be responsible".


Barkani explained that a plan was launched to transfer immigrants to other centres on the peninsula but this will largely depend on availability of places.


Sources say that the municipal department of health managed to acquire 200 vaccines against meningitis, to be administered to personnel working in the centre.


The Federal Police Union has condemned the saturation of the immigrant centre after the mass arrival of 500 Sub-Saharans after a rush on the border last Tuesday.


Currently there are 1800 migrants in the temporary detention centre, which only has a 472 person capacity.


The Red Cross has set up 17 tents to house excess migrants, and the army has set up another 10 tents to help handle the overcrowding.



'Walking Dead': Family friendly


Rick Grimes (Andrew Lincoln) in Episode 1 of season 4 of


Rick Grimes (Andrew Lincoln) in Episode 1 of season 4 of "The Walking Dead."






  • "The Walking Dead" is going to be edited for broadcast standards

  • It will air on the Fox-owned syndication channel MyNetworkTV

  • Starting this fall, MyNet will run two episodes a week from previously aired seasons

  • This move will make a family friendly version of "Walking Dead" available




(EW.com) -- Ever wonder what AMC's ultra-violent hit "The Walking Dead" would be like if it was edited for a broadcast network instead?


Fox-owned syndication channel MyNetworkTV has picked up the exclusive broadcast rights to re-air the zombie drama.


Starting this fall, MyNet will run two episodes a week, edited for broadcast standards, from seasons of the show that have previously aired on AMC. Though not one of the popular Big 4 networks, MyNet reaches 97 percent of the country and is likewise categorized as a broadcast channel mostly airing repeats of shows like "Monk," "House" and "Law & Order: Criminal Intent."


'Sleepy Hollow' at PaleyFest: Five things we learned about season 2


"It's not often you get to add the hottest show on the planet to your lineup," said Frank Cicha of the Fox Television Stations. "We just did, and it's a tremendous get for our stations."


"The Walking Dead" could have ended up on broadcast (it was famously rejected by NBC). And while we will never know what creative changes broadcast executives might have demanded of comic creator Robert Kirkman during a traditional network development process, we will get to find out what AMC's version will look like when edited for a more family friendly audience.


NBC renews 'Grimm,' plus 2 more dramas


MyNet confirms "The Walking Dead" on MyNet will be edited to meet broadcast content standards and will carry a TV-14 rating.


"The Walking Dead" launched on AMC with a TV-14 rating in 2010 and grew to become TV's top-rated drama among adults 18-49. But after protest from parents group the Parents Television Council claiming that rating was far too lenient for the show's graphic content, AMC switched "TWD" rating last year to the stricter TV-MA.


See the original story at EW.com.


CLICK HERE to Try 2 RISK FREE issues of Entertainment Weekly


© 2011 Entertainment Weekly and Time Inc. All rights reserved.



'Wheel of Fortune's' epic win





  • A contestant guess correctly with only two letters revealed

  • Pat Sajack said he was "rather stunned"

  • The win netted him $45,000




(CNN) -- Oh baby!


On "Wheel of Fortune" Wednesday, a contestant named Emil turned two letters into $45,000 during the bonus round. His luck (skill? clairvoyance?) shocked host Pat Sajak and thrilled the Internet.


After being given the letters "R, S, T, L, N, E" and selecting the letters "H, M, D, O," Emil had only "N" and "E" to work with on the final puzzle, a three-word phrase which was simply described as a "thing." Sajak advised him to just talk it out.


"You're a very good puzzle solver, but I don't know," Sajak said. "You have 10 seconds. Keep talking. Maybe the right thing will pop out. Good luck."


Emil nailed it on his first try: "New baby buggy."


His shock that he had guessed it caused Emil to utter, "Oh, my God," jump in the air and grab his heart. Sajak jokingly patted him down (perhaps for some sort of secret puzzle-solver device) and said, "I'm rather stunned!"


The host later tweeted "Tonight's 'Wheel of Fortune' features most amazing solve in my 30+ years on the show. No kidding." The video of the win has since gone viral.







Congrats Emil!


'Wheel of Fortune' pronunciation gaffe costs contestants, angers fans



Bergen: Pakistan hid Bin Laden? Prove it






Vice President Joe Biden, left, President Barack Obama, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, second from right, watch the mission to capture Osama bin Laden from the Situation Room in the White House on May 1, 2011. Click through to see reactions from around the world following the death of the al Qaeda leader.Vice President Joe Biden, left, President Barack Obama, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, second from right, watch the mission to capture Osama bin Laden from the Situation Room in the White House on May 1, 2011. Click through to see reactions from around the world following the death of the al Qaeda leader.

President Obama edits his remarks in the Oval Office prior to making a televised statement announcing bin Laden's death.President Obama edits his remarks in the Oval Office prior to making a televised statement announcing bin Laden's death.

Servicemen cheer from a lamp post as thousands of people gather at Ground Zero in New York City.Servicemen cheer from a lamp post as thousands of people gather at Ground Zero in New York City.

Crowds celebrate with NYPD officers in New York's Times Square early on May 2, 2011, after the death of Osama bin Laden.Crowds celebrate with NYPD officers in New York's Times Square early on May 2, 2011, after the death of Osama bin Laden.

Revelers gather at the fence on the north side of the White House.Revelers gather at the fence on the north side of the White House.

Afghans watch television coverage in Kabul announcing the killing of bin Laden.Afghans watch television coverage in Kabul announcing the killing of bin Laden.

U.S. Marines watch the announcement of bin Laden's death at Camp Dwyer in Helmand Province, Afghanistan.U.S. Marines watch the announcement of bin Laden's death at Camp Dwyer in Helmand Province, Afghanistan.

Times Square is filled shortly after the announcement of bin Laden's death.Times Square is filled shortly after the announcement of bin Laden's death.

Students gather to celebrate at the fence on the north side of the White House.Students gather to celebrate at the fence on the north side of the White House.

A passer-by looks at newspaper headlines in front of the Newseum in Washington.A passer-by looks at newspaper headlines in front of the Newseum in Washington.

Danielle LeMack, left, Carie LeMack and Christie Coombs, who lost relatives on 9/11, pause during a ceremony to honor the victims on May 2, 2011, at the Garden of Remembrance in Boston.Danielle LeMack, left, Carie LeMack and Christie Coombs, who lost relatives on 9/11, pause during a ceremony to honor the victims on May 2, 2011, at the Garden of Remembrance in Boston.

A visitor photographs the fence overlooking the crash site of Flight 93 in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, on May 2, 2011.A visitor photographs the fence overlooking the crash site of Flight 93 in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, on May 2, 2011.

Pakistani media and residents gather outside the bin Laden hideout on May 3, 2011.Pakistani media and residents gather outside the bin Laden hideout on May 3, 2011.








1



2



3



4



5



6



7



8



9



10



11



12



13








  • Peter Bergen: NYT article says Pakistan knew bin Laden was hiding in Abbottabad

  • He says reporter Carlotta Gall is a respected authority, but there's no evidence

  • Bergen: Why would many high-level U.S. intelligence officials deny Pakistan's knowledge?

  • Bergen: If Obama administration has information showing Pakistan knew, it must release it




Editor's note: Peter Bergen is CNN's national security analyst, a director at the New America Foundation and the author of "Manhunt: The Ten-Year Search for bin Laden -- From 9/11 to Abbottabad."


(CNN) -- The New York Times magazine is running a bombshell story alleging that the Pakistanis knew all along that Osama bin Laden was living for years in his longtime hiding place in the northern Pakistan city of Abbottabad, where he was killed by a U.S. Navy SEAL team on May 2, 2011.


The Times story, titled "What Pakistan Knew About bin Laden," will carry weight: It was written by Carlotta Gall, the dean of the correspondents who have covered Afghanistan and Pakistan since that fateful day in 2001, when al Qaeda's four hijacked planes crashed through America's comfortable sense that vast oceans insulated it from its enemies.



Peter Bergen during coverage of CNN\'s Anderson Cooper 360 on location in Afghanistan
Peter Bergen during coverage of CNN's Anderson Cooper 360 on location in Afghanistan



At great personal risk Gall has authoritatively covered the war in Afghanistan for the past 12 years. Indeed, I first met her during the civil war in Afghanistan during the mid-1990s when she was an aid worker, and I have met her many times since. I encouraged her (along with, I'm sure, many others) to write a book about her reporting in Afghanistan, as no Western reporter has more to say about what has transpired there since the fall of the Taliban.


The bin Laden story in the New York Times magazine is an extract from Gall's forthcoming book, "The Wrong Enemy: America in Afghanistan, 2001-2014."


Gall makes two astonishing claims in her Times magazine piece.


The first claim: An unnamed Pakistani official told her, based on what he had in turn heard from an unnamed senior U.S. official that "the United States had direct evidence that the ISI chief, Lt. Gen. Ahmed Shuja Pasha, knew of bin Laden's presence in Abbottabad." ISI is Pakistan's powerful military intelligence agency.


The second claim: "The ISI actually ran a special desk assigned to handle bin Laden. It was operated independently, led by an officer who made his own decisions and did not report to a superior. He handled only one person: bin Laden...the top military bosses knew about it, I was told."


It is, of course, hard to prove negatives, but having spent around a year reporting intensively on the hunt for al Qaeda's leader for my 2012 book "Manhunt: The Ten-Year Search for bin Laden From 9/11 to Abbottabad," I am convinced that there is no evidence that anyone in the Pakistani government, military or intelligence agencies knowingly sheltered bin Laden.





Gates on OBL Death: There were no cheers




Admiral: Destroy Osama bin Laden photos




Admiral: Destroy Osama bin Laden photos

How did I arrive at this conclusion?


On three reporting trips to Pakistan I spoke to senior officials in Pakistan's military and intelligence service. They all denied that they had secretly harbored bin Laden. OK, you are thinking: "But they would say that, wouldn't they?"


Well, what about the dozens of officials I spoke to in the U.S. intelligence community, Pentagon, State Department and the White House who also told me versions of "the Pakistanis had no idea that bin Laden was hiding in Abbottabad"?


During the course of reporting for my book I spoke on the record to, among others, John Brennan, now the CIA director and then President Obama's top counterterrorism adviser; then CIA Director Leon Panetta and his chief of staff, Jeremy Bash; then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton; then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Adm. Mike Mullen; then Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Gen. James Cartwright; then director of the National Counterterrorism Center, Michael Leiter; then senior director for counterterrorism at the National Security Council, Nick Rasmussen; then head of policy at the Pentagon, Michele Flournoy; Michael Vickers, who was then the civilian overseer of Special Operations at the Pentagon; Tony Blinken, who is now the deputy national security adviser; and Denis McDonough, who held that position before Blinken.


These officials have collectively spent many decades working to destroy al Qaeda, and many are deeply suspicious of Pakistan for its continuing support for elements of the Taliban. But all of them told me in one form or another that Pakistani officials had no clue that bin Laden was living in Abbottabad.


Indeed, an early debate between senior national security officials at the White House, once CIA intelligence established that bin Laden could be hiding in Abbottabad, was whether to mount a joint U.S.-Pakistani raid on bin Laden's suspected hideout.


This plan was rejected because the officials were concerned that such a joint operation carried the risk that word would leak out about the bin Laden intelligence. This debate would have been moot if the Pakistanis already knew bin Laden was living in Abbottabad.


And, by the way, if the U.S. government had any evidence that the Pakistanis were knowingly sheltering bin Laden, as Gall claims, why cover this up?


In 2011, the relationship between the United States and Pakistan was at its lowest point ever. Early that year a CIA contractor killed two Pakistanis in broad daylight in the city of Lahore, and both countries were trading accusations about each other's perfidy. The tension was compounded by the fact that the CIA drone program in Pakistan was then at its height, which was deeply unpopular among Pakistanis. What did U.S. officials have to lose by saying that bin Laden was being protected by the Pakistanis if it were true?


The fact is that the senior Pakistani officials Gall alleges were harboring bin Laden were utterly surprised that al Qaeda's leader was living in Abbottabad. Based on the bewildered reactions of top Pakistani officials to the events on the night that bin Laden was killed, it was obvious to U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan Cameron Munter and to U.S. officials monitoring communications in Pakistan that the Pakistanis had not had a clue about bin Laden's presence there.


Finally, in the course of reporting my book I discovered that bin Laden was even hiding from some of the people living in his own compound; forget about letting officials in the Pakistani government in on the secret. One of the wives of the bodyguards protecting bin Laden didn't know that the tall stranger hiding on the compound was al Qaeda's leader.


In fairness to Gall, I have heard from four current and former U.S. intelligence and military officials that some of the thousands of documents that U.S. Navy SEALs picked up at bin Laden's Abbottabad compound that haven't been publicly released could point to some kind of official Pakistani collusion.


If that is the case, the Obama White House should release any documents that are relevant so that the American public can be the judge if one of our allies was knowingly harboring bin Laden all along. So far there is no evidence that that is the case.


Follow us on Twitter @CNNOpinion.


Join us on Facebook/CNNOpinion.